Civil Liberties

The 2006 case, united States v. Jones, revisited a very important trim back that has been and continues to be difficult to play as the interpretation evaluate concealing always changes with our constantly changing world. In 2008 Antoine Jones was sentenced to feel in prisons for conspiracy to submit and to possess with intent to dispel five or more than kilograms of cocaine and 50 or more grams of cocaine base. The United States v. K nonts, on which the prosecutors relied, helped validate the expend of more or less of data obtained from the GPS track fraud. In the appeal that resulted in overturn of Jones conviction, it argued that although, in Knotts,(a) soul traveling in an locomote on public thoroughfares has no reasonable foretaste of privacy in his movements from one home to another, this does not allude to movements whatsoever. In Knotts, the defendant was introduce from point A to B (100 mile), whereas Jones was tracked 24 hours a day for 4 weeks. Beca occasion some courtyards deemed the use of a GPS tracking device not a search  therefore not a violation of the fourthly amendment and the court of appeals did, immediate clarification was needed. In 2011 the US self-governing Court grant the call for for Writ of Certiorari, which is a register that a losing party files with the imperious Court asking the coercive Court to review the finale of a lower court. In this documents, it presented the question Whether the warrantless use of a tracking device on respondents vehicle to observe its movements on public streets violated the fourth amendments.  \nTo protect citizens against electronic intrusion in places a one would consider private, the Harlans reasonable-expectation-of-privacy seek was employed, booting out the previous unwritten trespassory test. This has created a path of chance for law enforcement to physically and technically trespass on ones proportion if deemed person had no expectation of privacy . In summary, th...